State v. W. D.
Annotate this CaseFILED: May 28, 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
In the Matter of W. D.,
Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE OF OREGON,
Respondent,
v.
W. D.,
Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
070463293
A135501
Connie L. Isgro, Judge pro tempore.
Submitted on April 04, 2008.
Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and M. Ann Boss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Reversed.
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court's finding that, because of a mental disorder, appellant is a danger to others. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support involuntary commitment.
Reversed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.