HASSELBRING v. HOUCK

Annotate this Case

HASSELBRING v. HOUCK
2013 OK 53
Case Number: 109092
Decided: 06/27/2013

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

LISA G. HASSELBRING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOHN HOUCK, M.D., Defendant-Appellee,
and
JOHN DOE, whether one or more, whose real name is unknown and JANE DOE, whether one or more, whose real name is unknown, Defendants.

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

¶1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[i]n any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S. Ct. Rule 1.201.

¶2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recent decisions in Wall v. Marouk, 2013 OK 36, ___P.3d___ and Douglas v. Cox Retirement Props., 2013 OK 37, ___P.3d___, dispose of the issues in this case.

¶3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial court's dismissal of this case is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. Appellant's Motion for Oral Argument is denied.

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 27th day of June, 2013.

/S/CHIEF JUSTICE

COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, EDMONDSON, COMBS, GURICH, JJ. - CONCUR

WINCHESTER & TAYLOR, JJ. - DISSENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.