NOTICE CONCERNING AUTOMATIC REVOCATION OF SHORTHAND REPORTERS

Annotate this Case

NOTICE CONCERNING AUTOMATIC REVOCATION OF SHORTHAND REPORTERS
2008 OK 18
Case Number: SCAD-2008-18
Decided: 02/26/2008

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT RELEASED FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

Notice Concerning Automatic Revocation of Certified and Licensed Shorthand Reporters for Failure to Fulfill Continuing Education Requirements for Calendar Year 2006

Notice Concerning Automatic License Revocation
for Failure to Fulfill Continuing Education Requirements

Each of the persons named in the attached Exhibit failed to file a compliance report for calendar year 2006 continuing education requirements with the Administrative Office of the Courts by the close of business on December 31, 2007.

The license or certificate of each such person was automatically revoked, without further action of the Supreme Court or the Oklahoma Board of Examiners of Official Shorthand Reporters, effective January 1, 2008, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings of the State Board of Examiners (20 O.S. Chapter 20, Appendix 2, Rule 4).

Therefore, under authority of Article 7, Section 6 of the Oklahoma Constitution and Section 1501 of Title 20 of the Oklahoma Statutes, the Supreme Court gives notice that a person whose license or certificate has been revoked may not engage in shorthand reporting in this state. Section 1503(E) of Title 20 of the Oklahoma Statutes.

Reinstatement of a court reporter whose license has been revoked is controlled by Rule 9 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings of the State Board of Examiners. See, 20 O.S. Chapter 20, Appendix 2, Rule 4.

The Administrative Office of the Courts is directed to mail a copy of this notice to each person named in Exhibit A at the last known address of the person provided to the Board, the Secretary of the Board, or the Administrative Office of the Courts.

Approved this 26th day of February, 2008

/s/Chief Justice

EXHIBIT A

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.