DAHLENBURG v. YOUNG

Annotate this Case

DAHLENBURG v. YOUNG
1952 OK 162
243 P.2d 983
206 Okla 422
Case Number: 35421
Decided: 04/15/1952
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR - Dismissal where petition in error not filed within statutory time. Where the petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of three months from the date of the final judgment complained of and no order is made by the court extending the time, this court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter, and the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Caddo County; L.A. Wood, Judge.

Action for damages for personal injuries by Carl Dahlenburg against James Herbert Young, Jr., et al. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Dismissed.

William M. Franklin, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Oris L. Barney, Anadarko, for defendant in error James Herbert Young, Jr.

Haskell B. Pugh, Anadarko, for defendant in error Frank Hunter.

JOHNSON, J.

¶1 On the 25th day of September, 1951, judgment was entered upon the verdict of the jury in favor of defendants. On October 5, 1951, a motion for new trial was overruled. The appeal is from this final order. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed February 6, 1952.

¶2 A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal is not perfected in time as provided by 12 O.S. 1951 § 972. The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

¶3 The above section of the statute provides that the appeal must be filed in this court within three months from the date of the final order or judgment rendered unless there is an extension of time entered by the trial judge. East Side Baptist Church v. Morgan, 204 Okla. 685, 233 P.2d 957; Adams v. Hobbs, 204 Okla. 85, 226 P.2d 913; Sheets v. Sheets, 204 Okla. 88, 226 P.2d 915.

¶4 Since there was no order of the trial court extending the time to file the appeal and the same was not filed within three months, the appeal must be and the same is hereby dismissed.

¶5 HALLEY, V.C.J., and WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, DAVISON, O'NEAL, and BINGAMAN, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.