VAN PELT v. CALDWELL

Annotate this Case

VAN PELT v. CALDWELL
1950 OK 103
219 P.2d 205
203 Okla. 195
Case Number: 34417
Decided: 04/18/1950
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR - Order overruling motion for judgment on pleadings not appealable order.
An order overruling a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not an appealable order, and where an appeal is taken from such an order prior to the entry of a final judgment or order in the cause, such appeal presents nothing properly reviewable by this court.

Forest Van Pelt, Oklahoma City, pro se.

James B. White, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Plaintiff brought an action seeking to recover on contract for certain real estate commissions. An amended petition was filed and the defendants filed a motion to strike irrelevant matter from the amended petition. Without waiting for an order of the trial court on the motion to strike plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

¶2 On June 10, 1949, the trial court sustained the motion to strike and gave plaintiff 10 days to file an amended petition, and overruled the motion for judgment on the pleadings. On June 13, 1949, plaintiff filed a motion for new trial. On June 17th the court entered an order overruling the motion for new trial and plaintiff appeals.

¶3 Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss for the reason that the orders entered are not such as can be considered by this court on appeal prior to a final order or judgment. Assuming, without deciding, that this is an appeal from the order overruling the motion for judgment on the pleadings such is not an order which can be reviewed prior to a final disposition of the case. Plaintiff relies upon Board of Commissioners of Lincoln County v. Robertson, 35 Okl. 616, 130 P. 947. In Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Ry. Co. v. Parks, 182 Okl. 598, 78 P.2d 791, this case was expressly overruled. Therein the court said: 'An order overruling a motion for judgment on the pleadings is not an appealable order, and where an appeal is taken from such an order prior to the entry of a final judgment or order in the cause, such appeal presents nothing properly reviewable by this court.'

¶4 Appeal dismissed.

 

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.