BONNEY v. SMITH

Annotate this Case

BONNEY v. SMITH
1942 OK 420
132 P.2d 340
191 Okla. 622
Case Number: 30407
Decided: 12/15/1942
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BONNEY
v.
SMITH et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Appeal dismissed where question tried to court becomes moot.
Where a question tried to the court has become moot, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Frank P. Douglass, Judge.

Action for injunction by Nellie Smith and Emma Brazee against W. C. Bonney. From an order granting the temporary injunction, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

Arnold T. Fleig, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Twyford & Smith and William J. Crowe, all of Oklahoma City, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is a proceeding commenced by W. C. Bonney to review an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction. The basis of the order was the finding by the trial court that no due notice of sale was given in a tax sale proceeding.

¶2 Subsequent to the appeal herein the case in the trial court was tried on its merits, and the court, according to the certified copy of the journal entry attached to the motion to dismiss on the trial of the cause on its merits, held that the temporary injunction should be made permanent.

¶3 A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the trial on the merits has finally determined all of the issues involved, and that the appeal from the order granting the temporary injunction is moot.

¶4 We are of the opinion, and hold, that the appeal must be dismissed. Where the question tried to the court has become moot, the appeal should be dismissed. McCauley v. State, 162 Okla 153, 19 P.2d 561; Roper v. Board of Education of City of Okmulgee, 167 Okla. 382, 29 P.2d 950; State ex rel. Rives v. Halley, 167 Okla. 504, 30 P.2d 915.

¶5 The appeal is therefore dismissed.

¶6 WELCH, C. J., CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY and BAYLESS, JJ., absent.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.