In re CHICAGO v. CHICAGO R. I. & P. RY. CO.

In re CHICAGO v. CHICAGO R. I. & P. RY. CO.
1929 OK 274
280 P. 577
143 Okla. 41
Case Number: 20235
Decided: 07/02/1929
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In re PROTEST OF CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.

CANADIAN COUNTY
v.
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Taxation--Appeal from Court of Tax Review Dismissed Where Petition in Error not Filed Within Statutory Time.
That portion of Initiative Act No. 100 requiring the party appealing to file in said cause with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a petition in error within ten days after the filing of the transcript on appeal, is mandatory, and where the same is not complied with, the appeal will be dismissed by this court upon its attention being called thereto.

Error from Court of Tax Review; T. G. Chambers, Hal Johnson, and Harve L. Melton, Judges.

Matter of the protest of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company against excessive and illegal tax levies by Excise Board of Canadian County for the year 1928-1929. Judgment for protestant in the Court of Tax Review, protestee appeals. Dismissed.

Fred Wallace, County Attorney, for appellant.
W. R. Bleakmore, John Barry, W. L. Farmer, and Robert E. Lee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review of the state of Oklahoma in the matter of the protest of Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company against illegal and excessive tax levy made by the excise board of Canadian county, wherein the protest was in part sustained, and from which judgment Canadian county appeals. The judgment appealed from was rendered on January 30, 1929, notice of appeal was given by the county attorney of Canadian county, filed with the State Auditor on the 9th day of February, 1929. A transcript of the proceedings before the Court of Tax Review was filed in the office of the clerk of this court on March 21, 1929. No petition in error has been filed in this cause in this court, and the cause is now before the court on the motion of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company to dismiss the appeal for the reason no petition in error has been filed as required by section 7 of the Initiative Act. No. 100. No response has been filed on behalf of Canadian county.

¶2 The facts in this case are analogous to the facts in the case of In re Magnolia Petroleum Co., No. 20165, opinion filed May 28, 1929, 138 Okla. 205, 280 P. 574, and in which case this court announced the rule that: