MILLER v. HUCKABY

Annotate this Case

MILLER v. HUCKABY
1922 OK 336
210 P. 1034
87 Okla. 295
Case Number: 10849
Decided: 11/28/1922
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

MILLER et al.
v.
HUCKABY et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Failure of Defendant in Error to File Brief--Reversal.
Where the defendant in error has not filed briefs as required under rule 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi, 165 P. vii), nor offered excuse for such failure, and it appears from briefs properly filed by plaintiff in error that the propositions relied upon for reversal are well taken, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded

Error from District Court, McCurtain County; Chas. G. Watts, Assigned Judge.

Action between C. R. Huckaby and J. W. Miller, T. B. Wilson and others. Judgment for Huckaby, and Miller and Wilson bring error. Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

G. H. Montgomery and T. G. Carr, for plaintiffs in error.
Gore, Hosey & Jones, for defendants in error.

McNEILL, J.

¶1 C. R. Huckaby recovered a judgment in the district court of McCurtain county against H. H. Davlin, Whit Davlin, John Davlin, J. W. Miller, and J. B. Wilson. From said judgment J. W. Miller and T. B. Wilson appealed. The appeal was filed August 21, 1919. The plaintiffs in error served and filed their brief on May 8, 1922, and the cause was regularly submitted June 20, 1922. The defendants in error failed to file brief or offer any excuse for not doing so.

¶2 In the brief filed by plaintiffs in error the propositions relied upon for reversal appear to be well taken. This court, in the case of Bourke v. Meacham, 75 Okla. 107, 182 P. 80, announced the following rule:

"Where the defendant in error has not filed briefs as required under rule 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi, 165 P. vii), nor offered excuse for such failure, and it appears from briefs properly filed by plaintiffs in error that the propositions relied upon for reversal are well taken, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded."

¶3 For the reasons stated, the judgment of the court is reversed and remanded, with instructions to grant the plaintiffs in error a new trial.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.