RIGDON v. CLAYPOOL & WHEELER

Annotate this Case

RIGDON v. CLAYPOOL & WHEELER
1922 OK 228
207 P. 976
86 Okla. 262
Case Number: 12977
Decided: 06/27/1922
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

RIGDON
v.
CLAYPOOL & WHEELER et al.

Syllabus

Error from Order of State Industrial Commission.

¶0 Action by George B. Rigdon against Claypool & Wheeler and others to review order of State Industrial Commission refusing to award him workman's compensation. Affirmed.

Graham & Rollins, for petitioner.
Burford, Miley, Hoffman & Burford, for respondents.

McNEILL, J.

¶1 This proceeding was instituted in this court by George B. Rigdon against Claypool & Wheeler, Associated Employers' Reciprocal, and the State Industrial Commission to reverse an order of the Industrial Commission denying the claimant compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The questions involved are identical with the case of Walter Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler et al. (No. 12976, this day decided), 86 Okla. 262, 207 P. 974, and the questions there decided control the questions involved in this case.

¶2 The order of the Industrial Commission is affirmed upon authority of the case of Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler et al. (No. 12976, this day decided).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.