RECTOR v. SWANSON

Annotate this Case

RECTOR v. SWANSON
1922 OK 42
204 P. 299
85 Okla. 52
Case Number: 12717
Decided: 02/07/1922
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

RECTOR ET AL.
v.
SWANSON ET AL.

Syllabus by the Court.

¶0 An order of the trial court extending the time within which to make and serve case-made beyond the six months' period fixed by law in which petition in error and case-made must be filed in this court is void.

Appeal from District Court, Nowata County; C. W. Mason, Judge.

J. C. Daugherty, of Nowata, and Montgomery & Montgomery, of Bartlesville, for plaintiffs in error.
Glass & Calvert, of Nowata, for defendants in error.

NICHOLSON, J.

¶1 This case is presented on motion to dismiss appeal for the reason that case-made was not served and settled within the time provided by law.

¶2 It appears that motion for a new trial was overruled on the 12th day of April, 1921, and defendants were granted 30 days from that date within which to prepare and serve a case-made, and the plaintiffs were given 10 days thereafter within which to suggest amendments, said case-made to be signed and settled upon 5 days' notice by either party.

¶3 Various extensions of time were granted, and on July 2, 1921, plaintiffs in error were granted 40 days' additional time from the time theretofore granted in which to serve case-made. The time theretofore granted expired on September 9, 1921; therefore the last extension expired on October 19, 1921, which would extend the time beyond the 6 months' period fixed by law within which petition in error and case-made must be filed in this court. And again on August 1, 1921, an order was entered extending the time for a period of 40 days in addition to the time theretofore granted. This last order expired on November 29, 1921. Both the order of July 2 and August 1, 1921, which undertook to extend the time beyond the 6 months' period, are nullities. Memphis Steel Const. Co. v. Hutchison,

¶4 For the reason stated, the motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.