HURLEY v. CHILDERS et al.

Annotate this Case

HURLEY v. CHILDERS et al.
1921 OK 49
195 P. 755
80 Okla. 243
Case Number: 11744
Decided: 02/15/1921
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HURLEY
v.
CHILDERS et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error -- Case-Made -- Extension of Time--Validity of Orders. When the time fixed for making and serving a case-made is allowed to elapse, the trial court thus loses jurisdiction of the cause, and an order subsequently made by the trial court extending the time for making and serving a case-made is a nullity; and a case-made, made and served by virtue of such order of extension, is a nullity, and confers no jurisdiction upon this court.

Mounts & Williams, for plaintiff in error.
Wilson & Roe, for defendants in error.

NICHOLSON, J.

¶1 The motion to dismiss, to which there has been no response, urges that the case-made was not served within the time allowed by law or within any legal extension thereof. The record in the case discloses that the last valid extension of the time within which to serve the case-made expired August 27, 1920; the case-made was not served on defendants in error until the 22nd day of September, 1920; on September 20, 1920, and September 22, 1920, plaintiff in error procured orders from the trial court purporting to extend the time for making and serving a case-made, but these orders, being after the expiration of the time allowed by law or any legal extension thereof, are nullities. It has been held that when the time fixed for making and serving a case-made is allowed to elapse, the trial court thus loses jurisdiction of the case, and an order subsequently made by the trial court extending the time for making and serving a case-made is a nullity; and a case-made, made and served by virtue of such order of extension, is a nullity, and confers no jurisdiction upon this court. Whitaker v. Wilkinson, 80 Okla. 21, 193 P. 735; Cook v. Cook, 79 Okla. 222, 192 P. 215; Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. King, 76 Okla. 316, 185 P. 439; Walker v. Reginald, 51 Okla. 10, 151 P. 680. This appeal is therefore dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.