BRUNO v. MEDLINGER

Annotate this Case

BRUNO v. MEDLINGER
1920 OK 127
188 P. 878
78 Okla. 34
Case Number: 9576
Decided: 03/23/1920
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BRUNO et al.
v.
MEDLINGER et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal.
Where briefs are not filed by plaintiff in error as required by rule 7 of this court, the appeal will be dismissed.

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; L. G. Pitman, Judge.

Action by Michael Medlinger against Andrew Curley and others to recover real estate. From judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants Theresa Bruno and Samuel Bruno appeal. Dismissed.

Baldwin & Carlton, for plaintiffs in error.
Chas. E. Dierker, for defendants in error.

OWEN, C. J.

¶1 This case was submitted in its regular order December 16, 1919. Plaintiffs in error have failed to file briefs as required by rule 7 of this court, and, no reason appearing for such failure, the appeal is dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.