FREEMAN v. KING.

FREEMAN v. KING.
1917 OK 297
168 P. 436
66 Okla. 175
Case Number: 8121
Decided: 06/06/1917
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

FREEMAN
v.
KING.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Verdict--Review. Where the verdict of the jury, in an action at law is approved by the trial court and there is evidence reasonably tending to support it, this court will not disturb same on appeal.

W. N. Lewis, for plaintiff in error.
E. W. Fagan and T. N. Robnett, for defendant in error.

HOOKER, C.

¶1 This is an action by King against Freeman to recover damages for the negligent breeding of his mare to a jack of the defendant. The sole question here is whether there is any evidence to support this verdict. We think so. It could serve no useful purpose to reproduce this evidence on account of its nature. Suffice it to say, that in our opinion, a question of fact was presented by the evidence, and the same was submitted to the jury under proper instructions, and under the established rule of this court, the verdict of the jury having been approved by the trial court and there being evidence reasonably tending to support it, we cannot disturb the same. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.