DUNCAN v. RATCLIFF

Annotate this Case

DUNCAN v. RATCLIFF
1916 OK 1052
161 P. 1174
63 Okla. 19
Case Number: 6811
Decided: 12/26/1916
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

DUNCAN et al.
v.
RATCLIFF.

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; James W. Steen, Judge.

Action between Hank Duncan and others and Lillian Ratcliff. There was a judgment for the latter, and the former bring error. Dismissed.

W. Wilder, for plaintiffs in error.
Titus & Talbot, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 From the motion to dismiss filed herein by defendant in error, attached to which is the affidavit of the clerk of the district court, it appears that the judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted has been fully satisfied and discharged. Hence the questions presented here have ceased to exist and have become moot.

¶2 The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.