BYRD v. HARRISON

Annotate this Case

BYRD v. HARRISON
1914 OK 639
145 P. 318
45 Okla. 142
Case Number: 6988
Decided: 12/22/1914
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BYRD et al.
v.
HARRISON et al.

Syllabus

¶0 1. APPEAL AND ERROR--Perfecting Appeal--Time--New Trial. Where a case is tried upon an agreed statement which eliminates all questions of fact, a motion for new trial is unauthorized by statute, and the time for making and serving a case for this court runs from the date of the judgment, unaffected by such motion or the order overruling the same.
2. SAME--Extension--Validity. An order extending the time, and a case-made served in accordance therewith, after the expiration of the time specifically given by statute, are nullities, and a petition in error with such case-made attached gives this court no jurisdiction.

F. E. Kennamer and Chas. A. Coakley, for plaintiffs in error.
Rider & Hurt, for defendants in error.

LOOFBOURROW, J.

¶1 This case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts in the court below, and the record discloses no other facts except those shown in the stipulation. Judgment was rendered May 27, 1913. A motion for new trial was filed May 28, 1913, and overruled May 28, 1914. Defendants in error have moved to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that more than six months have elapsed between the date of the rendition of the judgment and the filing of the petition in error and case-made. Upon the authority of C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. City of Shawnee, 39 Okla. 728, 136 P. 591, and cases therein cited, the appeal is dismissed.

¶2 All the Justices concur, except KANE, C. J., absent and not participating.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.