GASKIN v. CLEVELAND WOOLEN MILLS

Annotate this Case

GASKIN v. CLEVELAND WOOLEN MILLS
1913 OK 357
132 P. 821
38 Okla. 229
Case Number: 4847
Decided: 05/27/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

GASKIN
v.
CLEVELAND WOOLEN MILLS.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Time for Taking Proceedings--Dismissal. Under chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11, proceedings in error in the Supreme Court must be brought within six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment or order from which the appeal is sought to be taken, and, when not so brought, this court is without jurisdiction, and the same will be dismissed.

Chas. E. Davis, for plaintiff in error.
N. C. Peters, for defendant in error.

DUNN, J.

¶1 This case presents error from the county court of Jefferson county. April 30, 1912, the motion for a new trial was denied, from which order the defendant on February 27, 1913, began proceedings in error in this court by filing his petition in error with case-made attached. April 30, 1913, counsel for plaintiff filed motion to dismiss because the proceeding in error was not begun in this court within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. In view of the provisions of chapter 18, p. 35, Sess. Laws 1910-11, wherein it is provided that all proceedings for reversing, vacating, or modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of, the motion must be sustained.

¶2 All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.