LEDBETTER v. KIMSEY

LEDBETTER v. KIMSEY
1912 OK 639
128 P. 1086
39 Okla. 282
Case Number: 2172
Decided: 10/15/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

LEDBETTER
v.
KIMSEY.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Briefs--Failure to File. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla viii, 95 P. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Owen & Stone, for plaintiff in error.
A. A. Davidson, for defendant in error

ROBERTSON, C.

¶1 This appeal was filed in this court December 8, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief; nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.