BUCHANAN v. STATE

Annotate this Case

BUCHANAN v. STATE
1988 OK CR 100
755 P.2d 117
Case Number: C-87-336
Decided: 05/18/1988
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

An appeal from the District Court of Tulsa County; Clifford E. Hopper, District Judge.

Bobby Lee Buchanan, petitioner, pled guilty and was convicted of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon, in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CRF-86-4366, sentenced to fifteen (15) years imprisonment, and appeals. REVERSED.

Bobby Lee Buchanan, pro se.

OPINION

PARKS, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner, Bobby Lee Buchanan, pled guilty to Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon, After Former Conviction of a Felony (21 O.S. 1981 § 645 [21-645], 21 O.S.Supp. 1985 § 51 [21-51]), in Tulsa County District Court, Case No. CRF-86-4366, before the Honorable Clifford E. Hopper, District Judge. The State Recommended a punishment of fifteen (15) years, which the trial court imposed. Petitioner timely filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which was denied. Petitioner has timely filed a petition for a writ of certiorari. We assume jurisdiction and reverse.

¶2 We find it unnecessary to address the facts, as we find that the trial court failed to fully advise the petitioner of the nature and consequences of his guilty plea as required by King v. State, 553 P.2d 529, 534 (Okla. Crim. App. 1976). The record shows the trial court did not advise petitioner that in pleading guilty he waived his right to confront the witnesses against him; his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination; that he was presumed innocent of the charged crime or of any lesser crime; and that the State had the burden of proving each and every element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 534-35.

¶3 On the basis of the foregoing, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in not allowing petitioner to withdraw his guilty plea. Therefore, the writ of certiorari is GRANTED, and the judgment is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein.

BRETT, P.J., concurs.

BUSSEY, J., concurs in result.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.