GRAHAM v. STATE

Annotate this Case

GRAHAM v. STATE
1971 OK CR 305
488 P.2d 621
Case Number: A-16761
Decided: 09/01/1971
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

An attempted appeal from the District Court of Alfalfa County; F.B.H. Spellman, Judge.

George Earl Graham plead guilty to the crime of Burglary in the Second Degree; was sentenced to serve two years in the state penitentiary, and appeals. Attempted appeal dismissed.

R. Michael Cantrell, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

¶1 This is an attempted appeal from the judgment and sentence rendered in the District Court of Alfalfa County, Case No. CRF-70-4, on a plea of guilty. In the Petition it is alleged that the judgment and sentence was entered on the 28th day of December, 1970, and thereafter, defendant below, filed an application for suspended sentence which was by the court overruled on January 7, 1971, at which time oral and written notice of intention to appeal and a designation of record were filed with the court, and the defendant was released on bond pending appeal.

¶2 This Court is without jurisdiction to entertain this purported appeal for the reason that an appeal from a judgment and sentence entered on a plea of guilty can only be entertained by this Court when the procedure set forth in 22 O.S.Supp. 1970 § 1051 [22-1051], and implemented by Rule 3.1, is followed. Rule 3.1 provides:

"To appeal from any conviction from a plea of guilty, the convicted person must file his Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the Clerk of this Court within ninety (90) days from the date judgment and sentence was entered in petitioner's case."

¶3 It is readily apparent that the Petition for Certiorari was not filed within the time provided by statute and the rules of this Court, and therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the same. The attempted appeal is accordingly dismissed, and the Clerk of this Court is directed to issue the Mandate, forthwith. Attempted appeal is dismissed.

NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.