Ex parte Wilson

Annotate this Case

Ex parte Wilson
1945 OK CR 110
162 P.2d 786
81 Okl.Cr. 233
Decided: 10/17/1945
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals

(Syllabus.)

Habeas Corpus-Burden of Proof on Petitioner-Writ Denied.

Habeas corpus proceeding by George Wilson to secure his release from the State Penitentiary at McAlester, Oklahoma. Writ denied.

George Wilson, in pro. per.

Randell S. Cobb, Atty. Gen., and Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BAREFOOT, P. J. Petitioner, George Wilson, has filed in this court original petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he is illegally held in the State Penitentiary at McAlester. In the petition it is alleged that he was tried and convicted in the district court of Wagoner county on or about July 18, 1935, for the crimes of burglary and assault with intent to kill. He was charged in four counts of burglary, all having been committed in succession the same night, and one count of assault with intent to kill. He was convicted and by the court sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the State Penitentiary on each of the five counts, to run consecutively.

It is alleged in the petition that petitioner did not have the assistance of counsel as provided by law, and that he was illiterate, and did not know that the sentences were to be served consecutively, but thought they were to run concurrently.

Response to this petition has been filed by the Attorney General on behalf of the Hon. R. B. Conner,

Page 234

warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary. The response states:

"Respondent states that he holds said petitioner in custody pursuant to the judgment and sentence of the District Court of Wagoner County, Oklahoma, committing said George Wilson to serve a term of 10 years upon a plea of guilty to the crime of burglary in the first degree after conviction of assault with intent to kill. That upon the conclusion of his present sentence, the said George Wilson is to be held in said penitentiary pursuant to three additional sentences of 10 years each for the crime of burglary in the first degree after conviction of assault with intent to kill, which said sentences are to run consecutively.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.