State v. Riehle
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as State v. Riehle, 2017-Ohio-9095.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, : : : - vs - CASE NO. CA2017-05-070 DECISION 12/18/2017 : SHAWNTAY MARICISA RIEHLE aka SHAWNTEY M. RIEHLE, : : Defendant-Appellant. : CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2015-09-1361 Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee Scott N. Blauvelt, 315 South Monument, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for defendant-appellant Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Shawntay Riehle, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose Butler CA2017-05-070 any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists four potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. HENDRICKSON, P.J., S. POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur. NOTICE TO THE CLERK: Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: Shawntay Riehle, #W098251, Ohio Reformatory for Women, 1479 Collins Avenue, Marysville, Ohio 43040 -2- [Cite as State v. Riehle, 2017-Ohio-9095.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, : : CASE NO. CA2017-05-070 : JUDGMENT ENTRY - vs : SHAWNTAY MARICISA RIEHLE aka SHAWNTEY M. RIEHLE, : : Defendant-Appellant. : The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Butler County Court of Common Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24. __________________________________ Robert A. Hendrickson, Presiding Judge __________________________________ Stephen W. Powell, Judge __________________________________ Robert P. Ringland, Judge NOTICE TO THE CLERK: Serve a copy of this judgment entry upon appellant at: Shawntay Riehle, #W098251, Ohio Reformatory for Women, 1479 Collins Avenue, Marysville, Ohio 43040 Butler CA2017-05-070 -4-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
