In re W.A.L.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as In re W.A.L., 2015-Ohio-826.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: : W.A.L. : CASE NO. CA2014-10-013 : DECISION 3/9/2015 : : APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case No. 20133106 Richard W. Moyer, Clinton County Prosecuting Attorney, William C. Randolph, 1025 S. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for appellee Rose & Dobyns Co., LPA, Blaise Underwood, 97 N. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for appellant Virginia Vanden Bosch, 9506 West State Route 73, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, guardian ad litem Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. Clinton CA2014-10-013 {¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, W.L., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. PIPER, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
