Dayton Bar Assn. v. Graham

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Graham, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-1296.] DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. GRAHAM. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Graham, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-1296.] (No. 2002-0699—Submitted April 1, 2020—Decided April 3, 2020.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, V. Ellen Graham, Attorney Registration No. 0030454, last known business address in Dayton, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 12, 2003, wherein the court found respondent in contempt for failing to comply with its October 2, 2002 order, revoked the previously imposed stay of the suspension, and suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Graham, 96 Ohio St.3d 470, 2002-Ohio-4910, 776 N.E.2d 23. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, and STEWART, JJ., concur. ________________________ 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.