DES Material & Supply Co., L.L.C. v. Pincus, L.L.C.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as DES Material & Supply Co., L.L.C. v. Pincus, L.L.C., 2020-Ohio-4360.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO DES MATERIAL & SUPPLY COMPANY, LLC, : MEMORANDUM OPINION : Plaintiff-Appellant, CASE NO. 2020-G-0255 : - vs : PINCUS, LLC d.b.a. PINCUS CONSTRUCTION, et al., Defendant-Appellee. : : Civil Appeal from the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2017 M 000984. Judgment: Appeal dismissed. John R. Christie, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, 1375 East Ninth Street, Suite 2250, Cleveland, OH 44114 (For Plaintiff-Appellant). Peter Turner, Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis, 28601 Chagrin Boulevard, #500, Cleveland, OH 44122 (For Defendant-Appellee). TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J. {¶1} Appellant, DES Material & Supply Company, LLC, through counsel, filed a notice of appeal from an entry from the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas. {¶2} Appellant filed a complaint alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and accounting against appellee, Pincus, LLC dba Pincus Construction and Corporation Service Company. Appellee filed a counterclaim for several counts and included costs and attorney’s fees. After a bench trial, the trial court issued an entry on May 6, 2020, in which it deferred the decision as to the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to a later date. {¶3} On June 15, 2020, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final appealable order. In its motion, appellee alleges that since an amount of the attorney’s fees and costs has not been awarded, there is no final appealable order. {¶4} Appellant filed a brief in response to the motion to dismiss. {¶5} We must determine if there is a final order, as this court may entertain only those appeals from final judgments. Noble v. Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d 92, 96 (1989). According to Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, a judgment of a trial court can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2003-L-116, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶ 3. If a lower court’s order is not final, then an appellate court does not have jurisdiction to review the matter, and the matter must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989). For a judgment to be final and appealable, it must satisfy the requirements of R.C. 2505.02 and if applicable, Civ.R. 54(B). See Children’s Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Tomaiko, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2011-P-0103, 2011-Ohio-6838, ¶ 3. {¶6} Pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B), there are seven categories of a “final order,” and if the judgment of the trial court satisfies any of them, it will be deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed by a court of appeals. {¶7} An entry which expressly orders attorney fees but does not specify an amount of fees is not a final appealable order. Ft. Frye Teachers Assn. v. Ft. Frye Local School Dist. Bd. Of Education, 87 Ohio App.3d 840, 843 (1993); see, also, Bell v. Bell, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2015-P-0054, 2016-Ohio-1016. Here, the trial court’s May 6, 2020 2 entry states “[i]n order to determine the amount of [appellee’s] attorney’s fees and litigation costs to be awarded, [appellee] shall submit supporting evidence of said fees and costs within 14 days of the date of this Judgment. [Appellee] may also include in such attorney’s fees those fees expended in addressing the Mechanic’s Lien at issue herein. [Appellant] shall have a period of 14 days after the date [appellee] files such supporting evidence to submit any opposition arguments or materials. The Court will thereafter determine if a hearing is necessary on such issue.” Until the attorney fees amount is determined, all matters before the trial court have not been resolved. Therefore, this judgment is not a final appealable order. {¶1} Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted, and this appeal is dismissed due to lack of a final appealable order. {¶8} Appeal dismissed. MATT LYNCH, J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J., concur. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.