Release -- January 11, 2002

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as R elease -- January 11, 2002, 2002-Ohio-51.] RELEASE JANUARY 11, 2002 ASHTABULA 2001-A-0061 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MICHAEL JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant. This Court, sua sponte, dismisses the above-captioned appeal for failure to prosecute. See Judgment Entry. 2001-A-0075 IN RE: BRIAN LOWE Upon the request of Appellant, the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Judgment Entry. GEAUGA 2001-G-2374 CARL MILSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SANDRA MILSTEIN, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee v. TREMBAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Third Party Defendant-Appellant. Upon the request of Appellants and Appellees, that part of the appeal against New York Life Insurance Company is hereby dismissed. See Judgment Entry. TRUMBULL 2001-T-0062 VALERIE NALBACH, Petitioner v. JUDGE MARY CACIOPPO, et al., Respondents. Writ denied. Grendell, J., concurs with Concurring Opinion. See Opinions and Judgment Entry. [CHRISTLEY] (O NEILL) (GRENDELL) CIVIL PROCEDURE: A party s due process rights are not violated when the trial court orders that notice of a hearing be sent to the party s last known address. It is the obligation of the party to inform the trial court of any change in her address. 2001-T-0093 IN THE MATTER OF: THE ADOPTION OF KRISTEN JEANETTE FRANKLIN (January 11, 2002, Release cont d) 2 This Court dismisses the above captioned appeal for failure to prosecute. See Judgment Entry. 2001-T-0109 DAVID TATE, Petitioner-Appellant v. STATE OF OHIO, RespondentAppellee. This Court, sua sponte, dismisses the above-captioned appeal for failure to prosecute. See Judgment Entry. 2001-T-0118 LORI A. ROOD, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JEFFREY L. ROOD, DefendantAppellant. This Court, sua sponte, dismisses the above-captioned appeal for failure to prosecute. See Judgment Entry. 2001-T-0121 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee v. QUANTE J. PRUITT, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal dismissed. See Memorandum Opinion and Judgment Entry. [CHRISTLEY] (FORD) (NADER) APPELLATE PROCEDURE: A criminal defendant is not entitled to be granted leave to bring a delayed appeal when three years has lapsed since his conviction and the defendant does not indicate in his motion that he took any steps during the three years to obtain knowledge of his appellate rights.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.