Hehr v. Hehr

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 23, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 233 Keith Hehr, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Mary Hehr, Defendant and Appellant No. 20210176 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Troy J. LeFevre, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Elisa A. Fischer (argued) and Theresa L. Kellington (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Alex S. Kelsch, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant. Hehr v. Hehr No. 20210176 Per Curiam. [¶1] Mary Hehr appeals the judgment entered by the district court in the parties’ divorce proceedings, arguing the district court erred in its distribution of marital property. The distribution of marital property by the district court is subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. See Willprecht v. Willprecht, 2020 ND 77, ¶ 19, 941 N.W.2d 556. We conclude the court’s distribution of property was not induced by an erroneous view of the law, there is evidence in the record to support the distribution, and, after a review of the entire record, we are not left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.