Interest of G.T.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 10/29/2019 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT ST AT E O F N O RTH D AK O T A 2019 ND 247 In the Interest of G.T., a child In the Interest of E.T., a child In the Interest of C.T., a child In the Interest of I.T., a child Lyndsey Tungseth, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.J. and S.T., Respondents and Appellants Nos. 20190257, 20190258, 20190259, 20190260, 20190265, 20190266, 20190267 & 20190268 Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Scott A. Griffeth, Juvenile Referee. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Diane Davies-Luger, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. E. Jane Sundby, West Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant C.J.; submitted on brief. Monte L. Rogneby and Megan J. Gordon, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant S.T.; submitted on brief. Interest of G.T., E.T., C.T., I.T. Nos. 20190257-20190260 & 20190265-20190268 Per Curiam. [¶1] C.J., the mother, and S.T., the father, separately appeal from a juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights to four children. The mother argues the juvenile court erred by finding the causes of the deprivation were likely to continue, causing harm to the children. The father argues several findings of fact are clearly erroneous and his due process rights were violated when the court refused to grant a continuance or make other arrangements so he could attend the termination hearing. [¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2),(4), and (7). Matter of Adoption of J.M.H., 1997 ND 99, ¶ 18, 564 N.W.2d 623 (“Prisoners do not have a constitutional due process right to personally appear at a proceeding for the termination of their parental rights. Prisoners’ due process rights generally are satisfied if they are represented by counsel and have an opportunity to appear by deposition or other discovery technique.”) (internal citation omitted). See In Interest of A.B., 2017 ND 178, ¶ 12, 898 N.W.2d 676. [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
