Interest of L.S., Interest of A.E..

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 42 A juvenile court's order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 42

In the Interest of L.S., a child

Chad Fischer, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
L.S., a child; C.E., father, Respondents
and
M.E., mother, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20180006 In the Interest of A.E., a child

Chad Fischer, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
A.E., a child; John Doe, father, Respondents
and
M.E., mother, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20180007

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Susan J. Solheim, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pam H. Ormand, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; on brief.
Daniel E. Gast, Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant; on brief.

Interest of L.S. and A.E.Nos. 20180006 and 20180007

Per Curiam.

[¶1] M.E. appeals a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights in L.S. and A.E. On appeal, M.E. argues the juvenile court clearly erred in finding that her children, L.S. and A.E., were deprived, that the deprivation was likely to continue, and that reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal of the children from the home. Because the juvenile court's findings were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.