Butts v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 161 Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 161

Mark Anthony Butts, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20180002

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Nicholas D. Thornton, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Marina Spahr, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Butts v. StateNo. 20180002

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Mark Anthony Butts appealed from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Butts argues the district court erred in denying his application because he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel and from his counsel on an unsuccessful motion to withdraw his guilty plea in State v. Butts, 2016 ND 226, 888 N.W.2d 206. Because the court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and support its conclusion that Butts received effective assistance of counsel, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.