State v. Coleman
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 38 Criminal judgment entered after a jury found defendant guilty of aggravated assault-domestic violence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 38
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Romez Michael Coleman, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170315
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Haley L. Wamstad, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. ColemanNo. 20170315
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Romez Michael Coleman, Jr., appeals from a criminal judgment for aggravated assault--domestic violence. Coleman argues the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict and the district court erred in allowing testimony about two physical objects that were subject to a stipulation and order restricting their admission into evidence. Sufficient evidence exists to sustain the criminal judgment, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony about the objects. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.