State v. Montgomery
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 268 Criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 268
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Ron Alan Montgomery, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170170
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Frederick R. Fremgen, State's Attorney, Valley City, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. MontgomeryNo. 20170170
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Ron Montgomery appeals from a criminal judgment following a jury trial for violation of a disorderly conduct restraining order. Montgomery argues insufficient evidence existed to support the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Gary H. Lee, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Gary H. Lee, D.J., sitting in place of Tufte, J., disqualified.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.