Kardor v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 205

Ibrahim P. Kardor, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160140

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Rhiannon L. Gorham, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 101, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Assistant State's Attorney, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kardor v. StateNo. 20160140

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ibrahim Kardor appeals a district court order denying him post-conviction relief. He argues he was entitled to post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective by failing to advise him of his opportunity to file a supplemental brief under N.D.R.App.P. 24. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.