Johnson v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 120

Marlin Lee Johnson, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160031

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Andrew C. Eyre, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks County State's Attorney Office, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, ND 58206, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Johnson v. StateNo. 20160031

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Marlin Johnson appealed a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief after he was sentenced to thirty months in prison for violating his probation. Johnson argues the district court erred in its findings and in denying his application because he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his counsel's failure to call the victim as a witness, his counsel advised him to plead guilty to violating a no contact order to garner leniency at sentencing for his probation violation, and his counsel did not explain the consequences of a probation violation. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.