Aker v. Neiber

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Order denying motion to amend parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 47

Paul W. Aker, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Diane C. Neiber, f.k.a. Diane C. Aker, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20150229

Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Bradley Allen Cruff, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Amy M. Clark, 321 Dakota Avenue, P.O. Box 38, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0038, and John M. Wilka, 300 North Dakota Avenue, Suite 510, Sioux Falls, S.D. 57104, for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
Samuel S. Johnson, 205 Seventh Street North, P.O. Box 5, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0005, for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.

Aker v. NeiberNo. 20150229

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Paul Aker appeals a district court order denying his motion to amend parenting time. Aker claims the ongoing conflict between the parties constitutes a material change of circumstances warranting modification, and amending parenting time is in the best interests of the children. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in finding no material change of circumstances warranting modification of parenting time.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.