Maxon v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 116

Cole Milo Maxon, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140314

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Cole Milo Maxon, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20140473

Appeals from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, N.D. 58106, for appellant; submitted on brief.
Allen M. Koppy, State's Attorney, 210 Second Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for appellee; submitted on brief.

Maxon v. StateNo. 20140314

State v. MaxonNo. 20140473

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Cole Maxon appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief entered after an evidentiary hearing and from a judgment resentencing him for possession of a controlled substance. He argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel when he pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.