Culver v. Levi

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Appeal from judgment affirming decision of the Department of Transportation to suspend driving privileges for 91 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 26

Corey Culver, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
Grant Levi, Director of the North Dakota Department of Transportation, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140195

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable William A. Herauf, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Thomas F. Murtha IV, P.O. Box 1111, Dickinson, N.D. 58602-1111, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.
Michael T. Pitcher, Office of Attorney General, 500 North 9th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for respondent and appellee; on brief.

Culver v. LeviNo. 20140195

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Corey Culver appeals from a judgment affirming a decision of the Department of Transportation to suspend his driving privileges for 91 days. Culver argues he was coerced into giving consent to the breath tests by the law enforcement officer's reading of the implied consent advisory. We have rejected this argument in State v. Smith, 2014 ND 152, 849 N.W.2d 599, and McCoy v. North Dakota Dep't of Transp., 2014 ND 119, 848 N.W.2d 659. Culver's argument that the implied consent laws violate the Fourth Amendment and N.D. Const. art. I, § 8, was rejected in State v. Birchfield, 2015 ND 6. Culver's argument that the implied consent laws violate the unconstitutional conditions doctrine was rejected in Beylund v. Levi, 2015 ND 18. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.