Harmon v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court order summarily dismissing a petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 83

Carl Aubrey Harmon III, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20110343

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Carl A. Harmon III, self-represented, 2521 Circle Drive, Jamestown, ND 58401. On brief.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State's Attorney, Williams County State's Attorney Office, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802. On brief.

Harmon v. StateNo. 20110343

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Carl Aubrey Harmon III appealed from a district court order summarily dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Harmon argues he was entitled to a hearing and his right to due process was violated when the district court summarily dismissed his petition. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7); see Ude v. State, 2009 ND 71, ¶ 12, 764 N.W.2d 419 (stating a petitioner is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his petition for post-conviction relief if he fails to provide any competent evidence to raise an issue of material fact).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.