State v. Marsette

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Conviction of driving under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 22

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Raunlyn Scott Marsette, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20110285

Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd R. Erickson, State's Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, ND 58577-1108, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. MarsetteNo. 20110285

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Raunlyn Marsette appeals from a district court judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence. On appeal, Marsette argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion for the stop of Marsette's vehicle. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.