State v. Mendez

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court judgment entered after revocation of probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 47

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Carlos Mendez Jr., Defendant and Appellant

No. 20110273

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jacob T. Rodenbiker, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee. Submitted on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant. Submitted on brief.

State v. MendezNo. 20110273

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Carlos Mendez Jr. appealed from a district court criminal judgment entered after the district court revoked his probation. On appeal, Mendez argues there is insufficient evidence to support the revocation of his probation. Specifically, Mendez asserts the district court did not take judicial notice of his two criminal convictions, and the allegation that he violated the terms of his probation by using alcohol was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.