State v. Feist

[Go to Documents]Filed Mar. 29, 2006[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2006 ND 52

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Roy Allen Feist, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20050423

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence E. Jahnke, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Peter D. Welte (on brief), State's Attorney, and Kelsee J. Macintosh (on brief), appearing under the Rule on the Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, 124 S. 4th St., P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5607, for plaintiff and appellee.
Robin L. Olson (on brief), 405 Bruce Ave., Ste. 100A, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Feist
No. 20050423

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Roy Allen Feist appeals the district court's order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He argues that the court was required to inform him he had to register as a sex offender if he pled guilty to indecent exposure and that the court did not follow procedures outlined in N.D.R.Crim.P. 11. In Davenport v. State, we held that because sex offender registration was a collateral consequence of a guilty plea rather than a direct consequence, the district court was not required to inform the defendant of the requirement before the defendant entered a guilty plea. 2000 ND 218, ¶ 10, 620 N.W.2d 164. Therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner