Whiteman v. State

Annotate this Case

Whiteman v. State, 2002 ND 166, 655 N.W.2d 84

Filed Nov. 5, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2002 ND 166

Ambrose Joel Whiteman, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20020163

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence A. Leclerc, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam. Steven D. Mottinger (argued) and Douglas Nesheim (on brief), Fraase, Johnson, Ramstad & Mottinger, 15 9th Street South, Fargo, ND 58103-1830, for petitioner and appellant.
Wade L. Webb, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.

Whiteman v. State
No. 20020163

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ambrose Joel Whiteman appealed a trial court judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. On May 22, 1998, a jury convicted Whiteman of murder. His trial attorney, Gordon Dexheimer, did not file a notice of appeal. On June 25, 2001, Whiteman filed an application for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on his attorney's failure to file a direct appeal. The trial court summarily dismissed Whiteman's petition. On appeal, this Court reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing, concluding Whiteman had raised genuine issues of material fact regarding his instructions to Dexheimer. See Whiteman v. State, 2002 ND 77, ¶¶ 21-23, 643 N.W.2d 704. After an evidentiary hearing on June 20, 2002, at which Dexheimer and Whiteman testified, the trial court found Dexheimer's testimony more credible and determined Dexheimer followed Whiteman's instructions to not file a direct appeal.

[¶2] We summarily affirm the trial court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.