Churchill v. Churchill

Annotate this Case

Churchill v. Churchill, 2002 ND 93, 647 N.W.2d 706

[Go to Documents]Filed June 4, 2002[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2002 ND 93

Kathleen D. Churchill, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Scott D. Churchill, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20020015

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIMED AND REMANDED.
Per Curiam.
Patti J. Jensen, Galstad, Jensen & McCann, PA, 610 2nd Avenue NE, P.O. Box 386, East Grand Forks, MN 56721-0386, for defendant and appellant.
Sherry Mills Moore, 300 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 4144, Bismarck, ND 58502-4144, for plaintiff and appellee.

Churchill v. Churchill
No. 20020015

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Scott Churchill appeals from a trial court order that denied his motion for a new trial or amended findings as frivolous and awarded Kathleen Churchill attorney's fees incurred in responding to the motion. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion and Scott's appeal is frivolous and completely without merit. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (4). We award Kathleen double costs and attorney's fees incurred on appeal. See N.D.R.App.P. 38 ("If the court determines that an appeal is frivolous, or that any party has been dilatory in prosecuting the appeal, it may award just damages and single or double costs including reasonable attorney's fees."); see also Estate of Opatz, 554 N.W.2d 813, 817 (N.D. 1996) ("An appeal is frivolous if it is flagrantly groundless, devoid of merit, or demonstrates persistence in the course of litigation which could be seen as evidence of bad faith."). We remand to the trial court to determine the amount of attorney's fees. See Jorgenson v. Ratajczak, 1999 ND 65, ¶ 26, 592 N.W.2d 527 (awarding attorney fees for an appeal but remanding the issue to the trial court because the requesting party's affidavit did not specifically document the fees).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.