Bettenhausen v. Bettenhausen

Annotate this Case

Bettenhausen v. Bettenhausen, 2002 ND 88, 647 N.W.2d 706

[Go to Documents]Filed June 4, 2002[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2002 ND 88

Roger Bettenhausen, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Joyce Bettenhausen, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20020012

Appeal from the District Court of McIntosh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam. Sidney A. Gross, Gross Law Firm, P.O. Box 154, Ashley, ND 58413-0154, for plaintiff and appellee.
Donavin L. Grenz, P.O. Box 637, Linton, ND 58552-0637, for defendant and appellant.

Bettenhausen v. Bettenhausen
No. 20020012

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Joyce Bettenhausen appealed from a judgment of divorce awarding her custody of the couple's minor child, dividing the marital property, awarding neither permanent or rehabilitative spousal support to either party, but retaining jurisdiction to again consider the issue. Joyce contends the trial court was clearly erroneous in refusing to award her spousal support. Further, she contends the trial court's division of the marital debt and property was also clearly erroneous. There is sufficient evidence to support the trial court's decision. We, therefore, summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.