Runge v. Runge

Runge v. Runge, 2001 ND 39, 625 N.W.2d 264

[Go to Documents]Filed Feb. 20, 2001[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2001 ND 39

Gregory Ian Runge, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Karen Kathleen Runge, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20000121

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Ronald L. Hilden, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam. Edwin W. F. Dyer (argued), Dyer & Summers, P.C., P.O. Box 2261, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2261, for plaintiff and appellant. Gregory Ian Runge, 418 E. Rosser Ave., Suite A, Bismarck, N.D. 58501. Monte L. Rogneby, Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for defendant and appellee.

Runge v. Runge
No. 20000121

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Gregory Ian Runge appealed the district court's judgment determining the valuation and division of marital property. Gregory Runge claims the trial court erred by not explaining the distribution and by dividing the couple's property inequitably. We conclude the trial court's distribution of the couple's marital estate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J.

[¶3] Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.