Wood v. Nunnery
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 100PA14 FILED 10 April 2015 TERRY WAYNE WOOD v. JEREMY NUNNERY, NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, D.C. On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 757 S.E.2d 526 (2014), affirming an order entered on 11 February 2013 by Judge Edwin G. Wilson, Jr. in Superior Court, Forsyth County. On 11 June 2014, the Supreme Court allowed plaintiff’s conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 January 2015. Maynard & Harris, Attorneys at Law, PLLC, by C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., for plaintiff-appellant/appellee. Van Laningham Duncan PLLC, by L. Cooper Harrell; Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, by James G. Exum, Jr.; and Bennett & Guthrie, PLLC, by Rodney A. Guthrie and Roberta King Latham, for defendantappellant/appellee Jeremy Nunnery. Brown Moore & Associates, PLLC, by Jon R. Moore; and White & Stradley, PLLC, by J. David Stradley, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae. Pinto Coates Kyre & Bowers, PLLC, by Deborah J. Bowers, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae. PER CURIAM. WOOD V. NUNNERY Opinion of the Court DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
