Cherney v. N.C. Zoological Park
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TINYA CHERNEY v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK No. 606A04-3 FILED: 7 MARCH 2008 Tort Claims Act; Premises Liability injury to zoo patron premises liability standard The decision of the Court of Appeals in this action under the Tort Claims Act for injuries received by a state zoo patron when a ficus tree fell in a zoo exhibit is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission for entry of a new decision and order in accordance with the premises liability standard articulated in Nelson v. Freeland, 349 N.C. 615, and applied in Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc., 355 N.C. 465. Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. ยง 7A-30(2) from the Supreme Court decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 185 N.C. App. ___, 648 S.E.2d 242 (2007), affirming a decision and order entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission on 28 April 2006. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 2008. Slip Opinion Knott & Berger, L.L.P., by Joe Thomas Knott, III, Bruce W. Berger, and Kenneth R. Murphy, III, for plaintiffappellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William H. Borden, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendantappellee. PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the Industrial Commission s decision and order is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission for entry of a new decision and order in accordance with the premises liability standard articulated in Nelson v. Freeland, 349 N.C. 615, 507 S.E.2d 882 (1998) and applied subsequently in Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc., 355 N.C. 465, 562 S.E.2d 887 (2002). The Commission shall enter its -2new decision and order on the record as it exists without taking additional evidence. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Justices NEWBY and TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. Supreme Court Slip Opinion
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
