Cameron v. Merisel, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

TOMMY DAVIS NATHAN CAMERON, and wife LISA CAMERON v. MERISEL, INC., MERISEL PROPERTIES, INC., MERISEL AMERICAS, INC., and BRIAN GOLDSWORTHY No. 227PA04 FILED: 4 MARCH 2005 On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 163 N.C. App. 224, 593 S.E.2d 416 (2004), affirming in part and reversing and remanding in part an order entered on 19 August 2002 by Judge Narley L. Cashwell in Superior Court, Wake County. On 12 August 2004, the Supreme Court allowed plaintiffs conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 February 2005. Hunton & Williams LLP, by Steven B. Epstein, for plaintiff-appellees/appellants. Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by William W. Pollock, for defendant-appellants/appellees. PER CURIAM. DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.