North Carolina Supreme Court Decisions 2002
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Pennington
Date: December 20, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 571
Docket Number: 185PA01
Date: December 20, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 571
Docket Number: 185PA01
Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co
Date: December 20, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 609
Docket Number: 19A02
Date: December 20, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 609
Docket Number: 19A02
Eastern Carolina Internal Med., P.A. v. Faidas
Date: December 20, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 607
Docket Number: 298A02
Date: December 20, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 607
Docket Number: 298A02
State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Carolina Water Serv., Inc
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 429
Docket Number: 267PA02
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 429
Docket Number: 267PA02
Best v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 430
Docket Number: 277A02
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 430
Docket Number: 277A02
Zimmerman v. Eagle Elec. Mfg. Co
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 425
Docket Number: 44PA02
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 425
Docket Number: 44PA02
Deadwood, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 407
Docket Number: 66PA02
Date: November 22, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 407
Docket Number: 66PA02
Eddings v. Southern Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal Assocs., P.A
Date: October 4, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 285
Docket Number: 10A02
Date: October 4, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 285
Docket Number: 10A02
Kelly v. Carteret Co. Bd. of Educ
Date: October 4, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 289
Docket Number: 139A02
Date: October 4, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 289
Docket Number: 139A02
Pitts v. American Security Ins. Co
Date: October 4, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 292
Docket Number: 369PA01
Date: October 4, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 292
Docket Number: 369PA01
City of New Bern v. Carteret-Craven Elec. Membership Corp
Date: August 16, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 123
Docket Number: 450PA01
Date: August 16, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 123
Docket Number: 450PA01
Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph Cty. Planning Bd
Date: June 28, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 1
Docket Number: 116A01
Date: June 28, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 1
Docket Number: 116A01
Morris Communications, Inc. v. City of Asheville
Date: June 28, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 103
Docket Number: 558PA01
Date: June 28, 2002
Citation: 356 N.C. 103
Docket Number: 558PA01
Bradley v. Hidden Valley Transp., Inc
Date: May 10, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 485
Docket Number: 29A02
Date: May 10, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 485
Docket Number: 29A02
Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc
Date: May 10, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 483
Docket Number: 596A01
Date: May 10, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 483
Docket Number: 596A01
Good Neighbors of S. Davidson v. Town of Denton
Date: March 7, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 254
Docket Number: 170PA01
Date: March 7, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 254
Docket Number: 170PA01
Bridgestone/Firestone v. Ogden Plant Maint. Co. of N.C
Date: March 7, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 274
Docket Number: 439A01
Date: March 7, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 274
Docket Number: 439A01
Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford Cty. Bd. of Adjust
Date: March 7, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 269
Docket Number: 603A01
Date: March 7, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 269
Docket Number: 603A01
Dobrowolska v. Wall (City of Greensboro)
Date: February 1, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 205
Docket Number: 270PA00
Date: February 1, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 205
Docket Number: 270PA00
Rich, Rich & Nance v. Carolina Constr. Corp
Date: February 1, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 190
Docket Number: 378A01
Date: February 1, 2002
Citation: 355 N.C. 190
Docket Number: 378A01
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites.
These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site,
or the information linked to on the state site.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.