State v Robbs
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. NO. COA08-621 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 2 December 2008 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. Buncombe County Nos. 01 CRS 9787 01 CRS 58967-73 STEVEN MICHAEL ROBBS Court of Appeals On writ of certiorari to review the judgments entered 17 January 2002 by Judge James L. Baker, Jr. in Buncombe County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 17 November 2008. Slip Opinion Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Hal F. Askins and Assistant Attorney General Christopher W. Brooks, for the State. Office of the Appellate Defender, by Assistant Appellate Defender Kristen L. Todd, for Defendant. ARROWOOD, Judge. On 3 January 2002, Defendant pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to: (1) second-degree murder; (2) assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury; (3) driving while impaired (DWI); (4) driving while license revoked; (5) driving a motor vehicle with an unsealed alcoholic beverage in the passenger area; (6) operating a vehicle cancelled, with no insurance; (7) revoked, suspended, or displaying altered a fictitious, registration card, certificate of title, or registration; (8) operating a motor -2vehicle which was not registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles; and (9) operating a motor vehicle in an improper lane. The sentencing hearing was held on 17 January 2002, and the following facts were established through the testimony of two law enforcement officers. On the evening of 24 July 2001 Defendant, the driver of a pickup truck, entered an exit ramp on Interstate 40 near Asheville traveling east in a westbound lane. On the exit ramp, Defendant passed several signs indicating that he was going the wrong way, but he continued traveling on Interstate 40 for approximately 812 feet before striking a Ford Escort head-on. The passenger in the Escort suffered broken bones in his neck, leg, and hand, and Defendant suffered lacerations on his nose and a concussion. The driver of the Escort died at the scene of the accident. Trooper Gene Williamson testified that, three-and-a-half hours after the accident, Defendant was not understandable, had slurred speech, was confused, smelled of alcohol, was combative, and could not remember anything before the accident. A blood sample was taken three hours after the accident and revealed that Defendant s blood alcohol content was .213. Trooper Williamson later spoke with defendant at the jail. Defendant told Trooper Williamson that he lived in Maiden and was going to Gastonia. Defendant drank three six-ounce bottles of Crown Royal as he drove, and had also taken some medication for depression that day. The only thing Defendant could remember about the accident was that he was trying to find Interstate 77 and thought he could go that way. -3At sentencing, the trial court found one aggravating factor, that Defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to more than one person by means of a weapon or device which would normally be hazardous to the lives of more than one person. court also found two mitigating factors, but found aggravating factor outweighed the mitigating factors. The trial that the With the exception of the DWI charge, the trial court consolidated all charges with the second-degree murder charge for judgment and sentencing, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement. On the second-degree murder judgment, the trial court imposed a term of 313 to 385 months active imprisonment, which is within the aggravated range for a Class B2 felony and Defendant s prior record level of IV. On the DWI judgment, the trial court found three aggravating factors and imposed a consecutive term of 24 months active imprisonment. Defendant did not seek immediate appeal from his judgments, but this Court allowed defendant s petition for a writ of certiorari on 10 August 2004. The Buncombe County Superior Court appointed counsel to assist Defendant in perfecting his appeal on 31 August 2007. Defendant only raises one issue on appeal. He contends that his aggravated sentence violates N.C. Gen. Stat. ยง 15A-1340.16(d) (2007), which prohibits the State from using evidence which is necessary to prove an element of an offense to also prove any factor in aggravation. Defendant concedes that this Court has previously decided this issue against him in State v. Ballard, 127 N.C. App. 316, 489 S.E.2d 454 (1997), rev d on other grounds, 349 -4N.C. 286, 507 S.E.2d 38 (1998). He further concedes that under In re Civil Penalty, 324 N.C. 373, 384, 379 S.E.2d 30, 36-37 (1989), we are bound by that precedent. reverse Ballard. by this Court s Nevertheless, Defendant ask us to We have no authority to do so. decision in Ballard, Defendant s conviction or sentence. No Error. Judges TYSON and BRYANT concur. Report per Rule 30(e). and Id. find We are bound no error in
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
