Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v Cange

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v Cange 2022 NY Slip Op 32966(U) September 1, 2022 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: Index No. 715888/21 Judge: Leonard Livote Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. r ÿ ÿ ÿ stuvwÿyzuu{|ÿ}~z{ ÿ}tu ÿ ÿ w ÿ ÿ ÿ ¡ ÿ ¢ÿ SHORT FORM ORDER 012345236 23783 9 9 9 NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT- QUEENS COUNTY~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Present: Honorable IAS Part 33. !"# Leonard $%&'()* Livote $+,&-% # ! . ¾¿ ÀÁ Supreme Court Justice /0 1 / 2 / 34 º»¼»¼½¼¼ ------------·------------------------~---------x 555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555556 ¯°±²³´ÿ¯¶·¸¹ WILMINGTON FUND 78 799 9 SAVINGS :799 ; 9< SOCIETY, 7 = ¥¦§§¨©ÿ«¬¦¨® FSB, AS TRUSTEE STANWICH ; >= OF ; 9 7 9 9 LOAN 8 9 TRUST 7 ? @9No.:A B CDEEEFGC MORTGAGE A Index 715888/21 #!3 3HH Plaintiff 3 <! G FCFGG Motion Date: 2/1/22 !I!3 -against J C Seq: I 7 99 = MARIE CANGE, < H ?! A Defendant. 555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555556 -------------------------------~---------------x K H##L3 I0!0 /1" ? C " #L !? K3 1 3 "M < H ?! H ! ? H ! ? ?3 13 3 I K3 !4 3 0/ /! K 0 N3 3 H K3 8 .GCCO!PO.P ! ?O!PODP?/ K #!4Q H4!0!43 M ! ? K @03 ! 3 H K ! / H#313 ! 3 0 4 3N #M! ? 3Q3 I K 34 H0 ? 4MA A 9 > < =9 34 H 3 = HH3 1! 3 = HH3?!N3 ! ? @K3"3 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA C R 3 = HH3 1! 3 = HH3?!N3 ! ?S @K3"3 A L 3 I HH3 1! 3 = HH3?!N3 ? @K3"3 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA D B 0#M HH3 1! 3 = HH3?!N3 ? @K3"3 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA E CT K A 0 K H I3 I0papers, !0 = K 1 3 Upon the foregoing the motion K3 3 1 I!I H 4# / ! 4 3 A< H ?! 1 N ?3 13 on K This is aUmortgage foreclosure action. Defendant moves to dismiss the I / ? that K! K ! / oflimitations H#313 ! 3 K ! / A L N =! ! 3I ofH K grounds the statute has run. However, as ! an assignee the H ? !#I N 1 0plaindff #!3 #HH3 3 # ? 3 3 11/ 3 MH 1 ! ! / ofH federal government is entitled to its immunity from state statutes #313 ! 3 V WXYZ[\]Z^_ ]\`aLLC abNWX cdXYef_Yg \hijk YZgSocy. _lmi`jg ^`n EG; .? limitations (Windward Bora, v Wilmington Sav. Fund , FSB, 982 F3d C.n=C RGo G? 3 TGTpPA 139, 142 [2d Cir G 2020]). The following papers numbered 1 - below read on this motion by Defendant for an Order for an order dismissing this action pursuant to the provisions set forth in CPLR §321 l(a)(3) and (a)(5) due to the lack of capacity and the expiration of the statute of limitations respectively and striking the notice of pendency. · PAPERS NUMBERED . Notice of Motion, Affirmation, Affidavits and Exhibits........................................................................... . 1-4 Cross Motion, Affirmation, Affidavits and ·Exhibits ............................................................................ . Answering Affirmations, Affidavits And Exhibits............................................................................ 5-7 Reply Affirmations, Affidavits And Exhibits ................................................... _............................ 8-10 Other .......................................................................... .. q 1 ÿ£¤ÿ [* 1] ABC DEFÿHIDDJKÿLMIJNOÿLCDPQÿRSTRUTURUUÿRVFWVÿXY [ijk]lÿ\`kaÿ[`aÿmn Z[\]^ÿ[`aÿbcdeeefghgc o]k]Zp]\ÿ[ijk]lqÿhnfhgfghgg 01 21345365 7895 186that 56 plaintiff 75 36 22 96 1 861 14 6 6 18 1 165 9 Defendant also argues is83 not registered with the secretary of2 State, and is, unable maintain an action to General 6561 5 34 8 therefore, 6 1 129 1 35 716to9 5 365 35 35 6 93 pursuant 8 5366 9 1 31 57 Association Law defendant has failed establish that plaintiff However, 9 1 1 4 12134536 582 5 7146to91 865 7 8 6 56 75 36 22 is8 889 56 93 5 § 18. (see Chase Bank, NA. v 23 Didato, 185 AD3d doing in state 36the 18 6561 !!"JPMorgan #$%&'()*+ (!,( )-./01 4(5%. 6 07 4 49 3 business 8 3188 801, 802 [2d Dept Accordingly, the motion denied. 8 89: 9401 692020]). 898;< 9 4 3 7 6 1 9 6 93 is84 13 14 = 8 9386 6 6186 1> 41 9 1?9 6 This constitutes the Order of26 the Court. 1, Dated: September 05 614@ 1 61 1 92022 899 ~ ÿ~ tuvvwxÿz{uw|} 9 2 gÿrsÿg [* 2]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.